In the past few decades in the building industry, concrete moisture testing has seen some significant changes in both methodology and technology that have ultimately worked to improve the understanding and best practices of the building and flooring industries.
Concrete Moisture Testing: A Brief History
Concrete is a construction material that has been around for centuries, and many monuments to its longevity are still standing. However, there are also numerous incidents of concrete failing or having permanent flaws because of problems that resulted in connection with moisture conditions. Measuring moisture levels in concrete has become a critical part of the process.
In recent years, a variety of methods for measuring moisture in concrete have become common:
The Calcium Chloride (CaCl) Test (or MVER), also known as the moisture vapor emission rate test: CaCl testing uses a desiccant material sealed under an impermeable cover and measures the amount of weight gain in the crystals over a certain amount of time. That gain is considered to be moisture emitting from the slab, and an indicator of the remaining moisture in the slab. It began merely as a “dampness test” in the 1940s but has become a standard test in the flooring and building industry, even though there is no scientific backing for the test method.
The Hood Method: First used in Europe around 2005, the hood method uses a moisture-resistant, insulated hood to cover a probe placed on top of the concrete surface. The expectation was that the test would recreate the conditions a floor covering would experience if installed on the concrete slab and give an indication of the readiness for a floor covering to be applied. It is the test method outlined in ASTM F2420.
Concrete Moisture Meters:
These function in the same manner as other moisture meters. An electrical or electronic signal is sent into the concrete and the resistance or return is translated into a measurement meant to indicate the moisture level in the slab. There is no ASTM standard for using concrete moisture meters for testing concrete slab moisture levels, although they can be useful survey tools.
The problem with each of these three methods is that they are limited to only the surface conditions of the concrete slab. (Moisture meters are also affected by internal elements, like rebar or admixtures in the concrete mix.) The reality of drying concrete is that moisture sits in a gradient pattern with moisture levels increasing towards the bottom of the slab, and ambient conditions can quickly affect the surface conditions without uniformly changing internal moisture content.
A more accurate method of testing moisture in concrete slabs was needed, and research indicated that relative humidity (RH) testing was proven to be more reliable.
Relative Humidity (RH) Testing
Relative humidity testing as we know it today began in Sweden in the mid-1990s. The studies performed there led to the conclusion that the best method for determining what a concrete slab’s final moisture level would be if a floor covering was installed was to place a sensor in the slab itself. Hence, this test system is sometimes referred to as using “in situ” probes and is covered under ASTM F2170.
There are two types of RH test probes. The first uses a cylindrical sleeve placed in a hole drilled in the slab, then inserts a sensor into the sleeve to take the reading. These probes are reusable but require calibration checks within a 30-day window before each use, and annual recalibration at a minimum. The second type, like the Rapid RH® 4.0, combines the sensor and sleeve for insertion into the slab and takes readings with a separate reading device.
Doing the Math: 40%
With either form of RH probe, studies prove that readings taken at 40% of the slab depth provides the reading that would coincide with the final slab RH level after it has fully equilibrated under an installed flooring or sealant. For the majority of flooring installations, 40% is the magic number for correctly installing the RH sensor and meeting industry standards. So, if a slab measures 6 inches deep, the test hole should be drilled 2.4 inches deep.
But 40% is not the right number for every installation.
Doing the Math: 20%
Testing also proved that for a slab drying from two sides, 40% was not yielding accurate results. For a concrete slab drying from two sides, 20% actually represents the most accurate depth for finding the final RH levels. With moisture exiting the slab from two sides, the natural gradient of concrete in the slab actually means moisture is highest closer to the center of the slab, than at the bottom as it is when the slab is only drying from one side. To accurately measure RH then, the test hole must be at 20% of the slab depth: a 6-inch slab drying from two sides would instead need to have test holes drilled to 1.2 inches.
Relative humidity testing, like the innovative and easy-to-use Rapid RH® 4.0, provides the most accurate available testing to prevent moisture-related flooring problems. To learn more about the science and history of RH testing, visit our free webinar at http://www.wagnermeters.com/rhvideos.php.
Understanding the correct depth for each probe means those results can drive your schedule and your decisions with the best possible information.