Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MMS- Are some unreliable with high RH?
11-07-2011, 07:24 PM,
#10
RE: MMS- Are some unreliable with high RH?
(11-06-2011, 06:19 PM)Rubensgt40 Wrote:  Some guys put down plastic sheeting, then plywood, then overlay timber flooring. Is this a reliable mitigation against slab moisture?

Yes it can be, I do that all the time for floating floors. But if I am using a solid timber or the slab is below grade I take it a step further and use something like Bostik MVP4 first, then the plastic, then plywood and then 15lb roofing felt and finally the timber.

I have also tested these systems before hand using the Rapid Rh, and even going so far as to do a few F 1869 tests on top of the MVP4, even though the ASTM guru's say you cannot do that. Not sure why because if you take a close look at ASTM E 96 they use a dessicant to evaluate the product they are testing, and that dessicant is.....calcium chloride. Kinda confusing huh? Whats more confusing is that many of these people who frown on the old F 1869 test will always refer to the ASTM E 96.

Stephen Perrera dba
Top Floor Installation Co.
http://www.tucsonazflooring.com
http://www.floorsavior.com
Quote this message in a reply


[-]
Share/Bookmark (Show All)
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Technorati Digg MySpace Delicious

Messages In This Thread
RE: MMS- Are some unreliable with high RH? - Ernesto - 11-07-2011, 07:24 PM