|
Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes?
|
|
03-17-2010, 06:34 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes?
>>>So I am inclined to say that since the surface is drier compared to the bottom of the hole, the average RH will be lower compared to the RH at the bottom of the hole. But <<<
Exactly |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - jigar0896 - 03-17-2010, 09:17 AM
RE: Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - Ernesto - 03-17-2010 06:34 PM
RE: Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - Travis L - 03-18-2010, 10:10 AM
RE: Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - CC Solutions - 03-18-2010, 06:16 PM
|



Help
Advanced Search




![[-] [-]](images/collapse.gif)







