![]() |
|
Cold Expansion Joint - Printable Version +- Concrete Moisture Measurement Forums (http://www.wagnermeters.com/concreteforum) +-- Forum: Concrete (/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Best Practices on the Job (/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Cold Expansion Joint (/showthread.php?tid=156) Pages: 1 2 |
RE: Cold Expansion Joint - CC Solutions - 08-15-2011 04:04 AM Sometimes it works out to be the best. I lose jobs every day because people don't want to do it right.
RE: Cold Expansion Joint - Ernesto - 08-16-2011 08:11 PM Doin it right is cheaper than crossing fingers. RE: Cold Expansion Joint - CC Solutions - 08-19-2011 07:14 AM (08-16-2011 08:11 PM)Ernesto Wrote: Doin it right is cheaper than crossing fingers. I may steal that line.... I like it a lot!
RE: Cold Expansion Joint - eaadams - 10-21-2011 06:53 PM Jd you mentioned the euco quikjoint 200. Perhaps you know the other products. I have a job where GC put euco 700 in a stress crack (poorly spaced joints) running the whole width of slab 80'. Now we can see a line tracking the crack repair under the flooring. Does that jive in your mind? I am having a hard time understanding the difference between them. RE: Cold Expansion Joint - CC Solutions - 10-21-2011 07:30 PM (10-21-2011 06:53 PM)eaadams Wrote: Jd you mentioned the euco quikjoint 200. Perhaps you know the other products. Understanding the difference between what? If you see a crack, the joint has moved. Why else would you see the crack? RE: Cold Expansion Joint - eaadams - 10-21-2011 07:49 PM Between why the structural engineer would spec a epoxy euco 700 vs the polyurea euco 200. When I read about the two it seems to say the.same thing. RE: Cold Expansion Joint - CC Solutions - 10-22-2011 07:24 AM The 700 is an epoxy and harder. Has a longer open time and would flow to the bottom of the crack better. |