Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
frequency to read RH
05-10-2013, 10:06 AM
Post: #10
RE: frequency to read RH
Jason or Ed can correct me if I'm wrong, but with the RH that high, I'd install a new probe in a couple of weeks and see what it says.

High RH means high alkalinity and that can damage probes. You will also have hysteresis to contend with. And don't forget the probe can be off by several percentage points at the high RH levels you have.

So if you absolutely have to guarantee the RH is below 98%, I'd wait until the probes read 95% and use a new probe for each reading.

JD Grafton
Concrete Answers for Flooring Problems
[email protected]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


[-]
Share/Bookmark (Show All)
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Technorati Digg MySpace Delicious

Messages In This Thread
frequency to read RH - eaadams - 05-02-2013, 10:14 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - CCR - 05-03-2013, 07:12 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - eaadams - 05-03-2013, 08:42 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - Rubensgt40 - 05-06-2013, 07:32 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - jim decker - 05-07-2013, 06:33 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - eaadams - 05-07-2013, 06:36 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - jim decker - 05-07-2013, 06:50 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - eaadams - 05-07-2013, 07:19 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - CCR - 05-09-2013, 04:25 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - CC Solutions - 05-10-2013 10:06 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - eaadams - 05-26-2013, 10:38 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - CC Solutions - 05-27-2013, 09:48 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - Erica - 05-31-2013, 09:49 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - eaadams - 05-31-2013, 10:00 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - Erica - 05-31-2013, 10:03 AM
RE: frequency to read RH - CC Solutions - 05-31-2013, 12:40 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - CCR - 05-31-2013, 02:00 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - CC Solutions - 05-31-2013, 02:23 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - eaadams - 05-31-2013, 02:26 PM
RE: frequency to read RH - CC Solutions - 05-31-2013, 02:41 PM