#Login Register
Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes?
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average


03-18-2010, 10:10 AM #3
Travis L Newbie *
Status: Offline Posts:1 Threads:0 Joined:Nov 2009
I would suggest getting a copy of F2170 (http://www.astm.org/Standards/F2170.htm). Section 10 specifies 40% of a slab drying on one side and 20% of slab drying on both sides which is then followed by:

"Testing AT these depths will indicate the potential equilibrium relative humidity that will be established within the concrete slab after a low-permeability floor covering is applied."

it doesn't sound like "an average of the RH through the entire depth of the drilled hole" is what they mean.

by the way,there is no reference to 75%RH in F2170.








Messages In This Thread
Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - jigar0896 - 03-17-2010, 09:17 AM
RE: Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - Ernesto - 03-17-2010, 06:34 PM
RE: Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - Travis L - 03-18-2010, 10:10 AM
RE: Reliability of RH Testing Using Removable Proves vs. Insitu Probes? - CC Solutions - 03-18-2010, 06:16 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread / Author Replies / Views Last Post
8 Replies 11,245 Views
Last Post by Rubensgt40
07-02-2013, 05:55 PM

Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)