Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bad, Bad Testing
03-25-2013, 05:43 AM
Post: #32
RE: Bad, Bad Testing
(03-24-2013 06:06 AM)hausenheimer Wrote:  
(03-21-2013 12:02 PM)CC Solutions Wrote:  Frustrating isn't it Jim? Tongue

It's a wonder how anything stays down sometimes.

I had a job once that just about every conceivable installation failure happened. Improper prep, WAY too wet slab, improper trowel size, improper patch mixing, improper glue set times, improper temperature during install, I couldn't find anything that seemed to be done right, yet for the most part the floor was holding.

My experience is limited, about 12 years, but it holds because the adhesives we use are not TOTAL junk. It will take at least a few years depending on circumstances for the adhesive to fail. Being a flooring subcontractor, and knowing my local competition, that is all that matters. Most of my competitors and the GC's I work for, all they care about are getting past our 1-2 year installation warranty.

Also, my competition, just needs to get past their warranty and they are out of the loop. Even the cheapest adhesives will stick for a year. It is very sad that the industry is like this. Especially in Atlanta, where there is SO much work.


DANGER POST!

DANGER POST! (Sirens should be going off at this time---) Tongue

While some improper installations will stay down on floors that are too wet - for a while - an installer is flirting with bankruptcy if that is his standard operating procedure.

Oftentimes the glue does take time to break down due to alkali attack, but other times the moisture alone can affect the bond strength enough that traffic areas begin to fail immediately.

Either way, the installer is not immune from a lawsuit regarding improper installation after a year, I don't care what you have on your contract or warranty page. Exclamation

JD Grafton
Concrete Answers for Flooring Problems
[email protected]
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


[-]
Share/Bookmark (Show All)
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Technorati Digg MySpace Delicious

Messages In This Thread
Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 12-18-2012, 02:35 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - Rubensgt40 - 12-18-2012, 08:15 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 12-19-2012, 05:20 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - Rubensgt40 - 12-19-2012, 03:07 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 12-19-2012, 04:00 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 12-20-2012, 08:09 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 12-20-2012, 08:34 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 12-20-2012, 09:32 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - eaadams - 12-22-2012, 12:24 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 12-22-2012, 01:02 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - eaadams - 12-22-2012, 01:46 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 12-22-2012, 02:54 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - eaadams - 12-23-2012, 11:50 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 12-23-2012, 12:30 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - Rubensgt40 - 12-29-2012, 04:43 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 12-29-2012, 10:26 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - Rubensgt40 - 12-30-2012, 06:30 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 12-30-2012, 06:45 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 01-03-2013, 10:36 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - jim decker - 03-21-2013, 08:41 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 03-21-2013, 12:02 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - jim decker - 03-21-2013, 01:26 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 03-21-2013, 02:48 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - jim decker - 03-21-2013, 03:31 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - Rubensgt40 - 03-21-2013, 06:29 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 03-21-2013, 06:58 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - Rubensgt40 - 03-21-2013, 07:47 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 03-22-2013, 03:28 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - hausenheimer - 03-24-2013, 06:06 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CCR - 03-24-2013, 06:40 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - Rubensgt40 - 03-24-2013, 04:13 PM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - CC Solutions - 03-25-2013 05:43 AM
RE: Bad, Bad Testing - hausenheimer - 03-28-2013, 08:45 AM